Repost Reader's response (revised)
In the news release, “Feasible for Cross Island MRT Line to run under Central Catchment or skirt around it”, the Land Transport Authority (2019) addressed the feasibility of two alignment and have each alignment impacts on the environment. Nature groups mentioned that direct alignment would affect the ecology and biodiversity. LTA claims that skirting alignment poses a bigger threat to the standard of living for the residents than direct alignment. Skirting route construction would cause issues such as noise pollution and poorer air quality. The longer route would cost an additional of $2 billion and take a longer traveling duration of 6 minutes. The article addresses the pros and cons of two feasible options. I feel that direct alignment is much more practical in terms of cost and travel time for the commuters in the long term. Firstly, implementation of the direct alignment would reduce the transportation fare for commuters . Cheng (2019) mentioned that...